|
I know it’s been discussed time after time on other forums, but we’ve yet to have the Rock Krawler suspension on this site yet.
Someone IMed me last night, all excited that they were ordering a 4 linked long arm suspension from Rock Krawler. I coughed a little and suggested he did some research into the matter, but he’s completely sold on this “new” Rock Krawler. I don’t understand why people insist on a product with a company who has such a terrible track record when there’s other options out there that, well, DON’T SUCK.
Specifically, their new “ZJ 7.0" X Factor Long Arm System” is what scares me the most. Details can be found here: http://www.rockkrawler.com/pages/cat...p?r_itemID=54\
What scares me about it? Look at the rear bracketry:
They claim it has anti squat properties, but I fail to see how. It looks like your every day 4 link to me, using their krawler joints which I’m not even going to get into a discussion on here.
What do you think about that bolt in bracketry? I sure as hell hope they’re expecting people to weld it in, but even when welded, I don’t think there’s enough surface area to distribute that load across that load along that thing frame rail.
What do you guys think, does this suck, or is my previous view on Rock Krawler getting in the way of my judgement?
I'm under the impression that this is the "shiny retail box" of long arms, for those that don't know any better.
looks like my sister engineered that up. garbage.
For those that have a 44A, are they going to weld it ? I think not. Ask anestech* about his crappy kit...
AW
that doesnt look very strong to me!!!!!!
am i wrong or just two boltz per side on the frame rails??
maybe for on road use but at high speed that scares me as well.
but hey im just bitch i need everything over engineered........
that set up might work nice on a golf cart though...........
So those lowers are being held on by 2 bolts? I know they have a lot of holding power, but that is scary and I'd sure want a little more of the frame to distribute the forces over. At least they aren't using the stock mounts anymore... this is better than that, but not by much. How bad are their Krawler joints? I know it seems like I've heard them wearing real fast.
I was talking about welding the bolted brackets to the frame rail, but I never even thought about welding that rear truss to an AL44. Ya, not gonna happen!Originally Posted by AprilzWarrior
look at the lower controll arm mounts on the axel.......
looks like they are going to get bashed up very nicely. at least with the stock control arm the bushing seems to stop them from bending in. out is another story.
noisy on road with those joints as well.
your right even welded i like the front and rear linked, a much stronger way to go.
add some angle iron down the rail..... it will still be a piece though.
I just looked at the prices.......... rip off....................
There is no reason at all to have heims at both ends of the LCA. That alone is terrible. How hard would it have been to put a rubber XJ bushing at the axle end. I sure hope a jamb nut doesnt come loose and the arm start rotating......
I've seen that happen on the trail to a homebrew style like that. It didnt last very long.
Just my opinion though.
I dont get how people come to decide on something so major and just from the look you can tell it is questionable. Then the others who just by on best price not thinging about the quality of the item.
I dont know much about these setups but Jerod helped me understand the importance of the Long Arms and this setup looks to be worse than a short arm setup and riding the unibody frame.
That setup looks scary IMO. I know a guy that put on on his ZJ, AK ZJ helped him out I think. I know it needed a good amount of bracing and extra fab work to make it halfway decent.
The upper side frame heim is a wierd phase although it is in a similar clock to what we are seeing on buggys. I don't know enough about that design quality yet.
Mouting arms in front of the axle tubes is overrated. Stock locations are fine. Leaves a skid for the drive shaft.
The truss isn't welded to the housing which is the only aluminum piece on the 44a. It is welded to the tubes.
Bolt on arm mounts. Yeah uh no. The frame rails are super thin. And they aren't even using grade 8. No thanks.
Solid arms are not as strong as a hollow. Never have gotten the reason why RK continues to use solid.
Why would one run the size tire needed to fill the wheel well with the amount of lift in their springs on a 35c? So why go after that breakage prone market?
Their joints....
Chad
it has some merrit, but as said, the design is weak. for something like that to work, at a minimum, there should be sleeves welded into the rails.
Hands up everyone who's ripped a RK bracket off the frame.... :?:
~Mike
Can you tell me why it is so bad to use heims on both end's of the CA's? Besides a harsher ride. All of my shit is 1.25 heims for all 8 of my CA's. I have seen a ton of people set up this way on pirate..Originally Posted by Pearce
there isn't anything wrong with heims. I think the problem is using the stock LCA mounts to mount them.
If I had a spare $2k to drop in my jeep, I bet I could tear them off in the first ride out
I know that the are using the bolts to pinch the new brackets on the frame rails, but does anybody else see the gap between the brackets and the out side of the fram rails. Or is is just the picture. They dont look as though they fit really tight. And why is there only one bolt on the drivers side?
Just to clear things up, RK does not use Heims, they use there own RK Joints... THAT SUCK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They clunk with under 500miles.
AW
Good luck welding sleeves INTO the unibody rails.Originally Posted by MaineZJ
Whats wrong with the stock LCA mounts? I've never heard of anyone ripping one of those off. They actually make a nice skid and help protect the rear pinion.Originally Posted by MaineZJ
i have
you don't countOriginally Posted by Kraqa
:twisted:
How come I've never heard of anyone ripping rear LCA tabs off? Uppers, yes and front lowers, but never rear lowers. Oh well, I don't think re-using those tabs is what makes that kit a bad option.Originally Posted by BigDaveZJ
Originally Posted by Tommy
I didnt say it was so bad. I gave a reason why in my post as well. Now lets look at this another way. How many people are buying the RK kit for like a buggy ZJ or for mostly wheeling. And how many people are going to buy it and drive on the street with it 90% of the time. It would not have been that hard to do rubber, it would have cost less, and you dont gain anthing extra with a heim on both sides. Not to mention that just seems weak given the current braket set-up of a ZJ axle.
Like I said, just my opinion. I think there is nothing wrong with your set up. But you made it yourself. Not a company trying to sell to the masses.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Thread Information |
Users Browsing this ThreadThere are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests) |