Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958

Warning: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in ..../includes/class_bbcode.php on line 2958
Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. - Page 3

Thread: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower.

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 249
  1. #51 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Mukilteo, WA
    Posts
    174
    Rep Power
    68
    Lookin good. As for the grille, I can almost guarantee the 5.9 grille won't fit. But the winch location looks awesome.
    '98 ZJ 5.9 soon to have 5" Clayton LA's and 33" BFG KM2
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #52 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    ....... Lifetime Supporter rstrucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    1,511
    Rep Power
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by zjeepin View Post
    case of beer?
    What's your flavor of choice?

    Thanks Trey, you'll save me a trip to PAP.

    Quote Originally Posted by CrawlerReady View Post
    I love how tucked back that winch is! So are you cutting the grill out to fit around it or does it just fit snug against it? (can't tell from the pics) My winch has ~1/2" gap between it and the grill and it looks like it sticks out much further than that.
    Thanks. I am either going to cut up a non 5.9 grill for trail use or I'll just run w/o one. That way I can put the stock grill back in when I pull the winch for street duty. I did have to notch the plastic headlight header panel and remove some metal from the factory front crossmember so the winch could fit as close as possible. I'll post some pics up in the next day or two of the trim job.
    Thank you to those that serve our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #53 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member zjeepin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boone NC
    Posts
    2,282
    Rep Power
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by rstrucks View Post
    What's your flavor of choice?

    Thanks Trey, you'll save me a trip to PAP.
    hmmm, hows about newcastle?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #54 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Mukilteo, WA
    Posts
    174
    Rep Power
    68
    If you want one, I actually have a platinum 5.9L grille that was damaged in the lower corner, which probably doesn't matter since it'll be cut up.

    It'd look way better on your Jeep than on my garage wall.
    '98 ZJ 5.9 soon to have 5" Clayton LA's and 33" BFG KM2
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #55 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    ....... Lifetime Supporter rstrucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    1,511
    Rep Power
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by NIK5.9 View Post
    If you want one, I actually have a platinum 5.9L grille that was damaged in the lower corner, which probably doesn't matter since it'll be cut up.

    It'd look way better on your Jeep than on my garage wall.
    I'd happily pay for the ride if you're willing to send it. I'll throw in some extra change for a six pack of really cheap, crappy bear too.
    Thank you to those that serve our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #56 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member Jeeptech01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,354
    Rep Power
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by rstrucks View Post
    send really cheap, crappy bear too.
    I try not to drink too much bear always gives me a hungover
    2004 Ford Lightning

    Autism? Its more common than you think..
    http://www.autismspeaks.org/whatisit/index.php
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #57 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    My avatar isn't animated Lifetime Supporter SirFuego's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Elma, NY (near Buffalo)
    Posts
    2,765
    Rep Power
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by rstrucks View Post
    I'll throw in some extra change for a six pack of really cheap, crappy bear too.
    Six inexpensive, diarrhetic bears...That must smell awful.
    Quote Originally Posted by SB406
    I think that's your signature move.
    "The Former"- Lay Jeep against obstacle in trail. Mat gas pedal. Form Jeep to the shape of obstacle.
    Robot
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #58 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    ....... Lifetime Supporter rstrucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    1,511
    Rep Power
    107
    Haha! What a dumbass. I mean who thinks you can get six bears for cheap?

    I was just spelling it the way some people pronounce it here in the south.



    I'm not even going to edit that.
    Thank you to those that serve our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #59 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member Jeeptech01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    2,354
    Rep Power
    109
    LOL
    2004 Ford Lightning

    Autism? Its more common than you think..
    http://www.autismspeaks.org/whatisit/index.php
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #60 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    ....... Lifetime Supporter rstrucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    1,511
    Rep Power
    107
    Here are some pics of how close the winch is to the plastic header panel. When I pull the bumper for a final welding check and painting I'll snap off a pic of the notches I cut in the front crossmember.





    To install the Super Duty knuckles I need to install some ball joint inner C's that will work with them. I have two options, neither of them ideal. Months ago I bought some BJ C's in preperation for this mod. They are Solid brand C's and they are new. The problem is that they are bored to a diameter of 3.125" and my axle tubes are only 3". I would need to come up with some way to make up the difference for a solid install. I had thoughr about it and even cut up some 3.125" tube with a wall thickness of .5". What I had thought was to use the sleeves to butt weld to the axle tube then install the knuckles, which would pass over the butt weld and then weld them to the 3" tube about a 1/2" inboard of the butt weld. Tough to explain. I would also gusset the hell out of the knuckle to add as much strength as possible.



    The other option, and what I am 99.9% sure I'll go with, is to sleeve my 3.5" bore, used, Super Duty knuckles with a section of 3.5" .250 wall DOM. Outwardly it will look less "factory" but I'm sure it's the better way to go. I plan on driving the tube sleeves on, welding to the tubes at the end of the sleeves and four plug welds on each and then adding the C's with the standard weld to the sleeve.



    This way will also not trap mud, water and other debris in the axle tube. Obviously the best option would be to remove the center section and press in new axle tubes and weld on new mounts, blah, blah, blah. No time for that.

    I also don't have much real estate to work with thus the reason for the step in the sleeve. Gussets will be added to this as well.



    Any of you smart engineer types have an opinion on this?
    Thank you to those that serve our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #61 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Glen Burnie, MD
    Posts
    145
    Rep Power
    66
    Have a machince shop make you a sleeve to slide inside the solid c's?

    Rick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #62 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    ....... Lifetime Supporter rstrucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    1,511
    Rep Power
    107
    I love getting new tires.





    I can't wait to have these bishes mounted up and installed under my ZJ. They are 37x12.50x17 Pitbull Rocker Radials and they measure out at about 36.5". I'm really anxious to see how they do at Windrock next month. If they aren't totally obnoxious on the street I'll probably get rid of my KM2's and just run these all the time. We'll see.
    Thank you to those that serve our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #63 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    ....... Lifetime Supporter rstrucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    1,511
    Rep Power
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by Ramsport59 View Post
    Have a machince shop make you a sleeve to slide inside the solid c's?

    Rick
    It would only be 1/16th of and inch thick, is that what you are taking about? I had though about making some sleeves that fit the Solid C's and that would slide on the inside of the axle tube.
    Thank you to those that serve our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #64 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Central Mass.
    Posts
    795
    Rep Power
    86
    Beautiful tires. I've been looking at getting a set of the 35's they came out with. I'm looking forward to hear how they do on the road as well as the rocks.

    Build is looking good, Ryan.

    Do you ever regret not eliminating the track bar with the long arm upgrade in the rear?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #65 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    ....... Lifetime Supporter rstrucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    1,511
    Rep Power
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by Derek33 View Post
    Beautiful tires. I've been looking at getting a set of the 35's they came out with. I'm looking forward to hear how they do on the road as well as the rocks.

    Build is looking good, Ryan.

    Do you ever regret not eliminating the track bar with the long arm upgrade in the rear?
    Thanks man, I'll be sure to give a "road report".

    As for the TB. I actually haven't really minded it too much so far. However, I do plan on re-doing the front and rear supension sometime this spring/summer. I am thinking of using all my current arms and going three link up front w/ a TB and a triangulated four link out back.
    Thank you to those that serve our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #66 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,153
    Rep Power
    114
    how far onto the tubes would the solid C's go? All the way to that spring perch you have shown in that pic?

    The superduty route seems mechanically sound but getting to use the Solid ones would be nice. I'm also always a fan of nice clean solutions......

    Do you think Solid would consider taking those back on a discount towards a custom set of 3" bored ones?


    Those PBRs are
    Last edited by paulkeith; 01-28-2010 at 12:21 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #67 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Glen Burnie, MD
    Posts
    145
    Rep Power
    66
    Yes, making a 1/16th sleeve....Yes its thin, but once its on and centered, which is the only reason you need it, the welds will melt that in nice....

    Rick
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #68 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    ....... Lifetime Supporter rstrucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    1,511
    Rep Power
    107
    How far the C's slide onto the tube is the other half of the problem. I'll have to leave some room for the coil spring. I had mocked it up recently and IIRC I had about an inch of "overlap".

    Actually the 1/16" spacer was my first try but the C wasn't supported enough for me to be comfortable with.

    I bought the Solid knuckles from a local guy, not a dealer so I don't know if they would take 'em on trade or not. Plus shipping would add up and piss me off.

    I too am a fan of clean solutions. I am also a fan of cheap ones.
    Thank you to those that serve our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #69 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member zjeepin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boone NC
    Posts
    2,282
    Rep Power
    119
    Ryan, I hope you like your rockers as much as I do. my are 42's so a little different beast. I've only run them once at harlan back at thanksgiving but i fell in love.. they are sticky as as hell. You'll really like them on the road too, they are almost silent, i have no idea how they will wear cause my rigs not street legal in NC. you'll love those tires tough, good choice!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #70 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,153
    Rep Power
    114
    how deep is the bore in solid C's? 2"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #71 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    SL,UT
    Posts
    2,189
    Rep Power
    157
    I want your tires. The winch looks good too man!

    Sucks about the C's, I was thinking the same thing as Ramsport, a 1/16" sleeve. After looking at your ideas though, I think I'd be more comfortable with option 2.
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyZJ View Post
    The password is newbgasm.
    www.crawlerready.com
    "For The Truly Addicted!"

    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #72 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    1,319
    Rep Power
    88
    My buddy runs a set of pitbull rockers and swears by them. i have to say they do ton better then his irocs. Supposedly as you run them they will stretch a bit to give the full 37". Well this is at least what was told to my buddy by the dealer, hes had them about 6 months and they have yet to grow.
    93ish zj, d60s, 38.5 maxxis, and a bunch of other expensive parts to make them work.

    Truck stacks, for when your trucks nuts are just not gay enough anymore.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #73 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    SL,UT
    Posts
    2,189
    Rep Power
    157
    I think they will be my next (and last) set of tires....especially if they grow over time!
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyZJ View Post
    The password is newbgasm.
    www.crawlerready.com
    "For The Truly Addicted!"

    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #74 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    ....... Lifetime Supporter rstrucks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Tn
    Posts
    1,511
    Rep Power
    107
    Both the Solid and the Ford C's have about a 1.75" bore depth.

    I was pretty damn happy with my KM2's so I'm looking forward to running a serious off road tire.
    Last edited by rstrucks; 01-29-2010 at 12:20 AM.
    Thank you to those that serve our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #75 Re: Stage II - bigger, heavier, slower. 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    SL,UT
    Posts
    2,189
    Rep Power
    157
    I'm sure you won't be disappointed with them.
    Quote Originally Posted by IndyZJ View Post
    The password is newbgasm.
    www.crawlerready.com
    "For The Truly Addicted!"

    Reply With Quote  
     

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •