Thread: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1 Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Berkeley Springs, WV
    Posts
    56
    Rep Power
    0
    My question concerns transmissions more than the actual crawl ratio. I would think that two rigs with the same or very similar crawls and tires, would descend a hill at the same rate. But after driving different stuff, the manual seems to hold back better. Is this because of the torque converter not locking up? Also, would an auto with 100:1 idle through stuff or up hills like a manual of the same gearing?
    FOR SALE, red, lifted, 96 V8. Some armor, gears, and a trutrac.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Re: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mountain View, California, United States
    Posts
    621
    Rep Power
    76
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve98 View Post
    My question concerns transmissions more than the actual crawl ratio. I would think that two rigs with the same or very similar crawls and tires, would descend a hill at the same rate. But after driving different stuff, the manual seems to hold back better. Is this because of the torque converter not locking up? Also, would an auto with 100:1 idle through stuff or up hills like a manual of the same gearing?

    The manual is generally geared lower than an auto therefor causing it to crawl slower.
    Will

    99 4.0 DubJ 35"MTRs/ Custom IRO LA's/ Currie 9" housing/ Yukon 4.88 Gears 35 spline Grizzly Rear Lockers and ARB Front.

    The Hookup Build http://www.mallcrawlin.com/forum/showthread.php?t=12701
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Berkeley Springs, WV
    Posts
    56
    Rep Power
    0
    I said same crawl ratio. The individual gears don't really matter.
    FOR SALE, red, lifted, 96 V8. Some armor, gears, and a trutrac.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4 Re: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Senior Member IndyZJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    1,524
    Rep Power
    112
    Manuals give (more) compression braking, which would make it idle slower down a hill. Some aftermarket valve bodies do the same for automatics, though. Autos are much easier to drive (no shit), especially offroad since the torque converter keeps the engine from stalling.
    re: testy
    Quote Originally Posted by CrawlerReady
    scrotum.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Senior Member ATL ZJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    6,169
    Rep Power
    191
    Usually when you calculate crawl ratio for an automatic you multiply your result by a 2x factor to account for the torque converter. If you don't do that, if you have a manual and an auto with the same crawl ratio, the auto will "act" lower. You can't really look at it as simply as you are doing. Just understand how they both work and it will make sense to you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6 Re: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Berkeley Springs, WV
    Posts
    56
    Rep Power
    0
    I realize they don't act the same. So I guess no, would be the answer. Does anyone here use a shift kit or modded valve body? Would there be any real advantages to it?

    Although I really prefer a manual in all cars, the jeep is a different story. I like the slushbox for my jeeps purpose. I just thought maybe there is a way to get more compression braking feel from it on descents.
    FOR SALE, red, lifted, 96 V8. Some armor, gears, and a trutrac.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7 Re: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Senior Member ATL ZJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    6,169
    Rep Power
    191
    Gotcha. A full manual valve body will accomplish mostly the same thing as as manual, since the trans won't change gears on its own and you will have to shift it manually. IMO a reverse full manual valve body in a beefed auto is the ultimate for a wheeling rig. It just comes at a price.

    The advantages to an built automatic on the trail are its ease of use and its smooth power transfer.

    The advantages to a granny manual are simplicity and a source of inexpensive low gearing.

    There are some excellent threads on pirate about this that are stuffed with more tech than you can stomach in a single sitting.
    Last edited by ATL ZJ; 10-10-2008 at 10:42 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8 Re: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Calgary, AB, Canada
    Posts
    344
    Rep Power
    76
    I have converted one offroad rig form stick to auto and one rig from auto to stick. Nothing else changed on the rigs.

    In both cases I found that the auto was nicer to drive offroad and gave me more control as I could "feather" the gas pedal more over rocks however I did not have near the same compression braking going downhill. Unless you can manually lock up the TC going downhill the TC will "slip" and not give as good compression braking as a stick. Going uphill the TC is working and I havn't noticed a difference there.

    For reliabiltiy I would say sticks are better, less to go wrong. Autos don't like water in them, don't like to get hot, don't like holes in them. Although I've seen guys slip clutches powering up an obstacle with big tires or completely ruin a clutch by getting stuck in deep mud and then pushing in the clutch pedal. This allows mud/dirt to get between the plates and within 20km of getting out of the hole the clutch is toast and usually takes the flywheel with it.
    1998 5.9er, 6" Claytons Long arm, D30(elocker), Rubi D44 rear, TJ Addco rear sway bar, WJ knuckles/brakes, 4.10s, 33s, 9.5ti

    '93 ZJ LTD, 5.2L, Claytons Longarm, 8" lift D44 front(w/elocker), D60 rear(welded), 37" IROKS, 5.38s, 9.5ti<scrapped>
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 Re: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Senior Member DJJordache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    2,854
    Rep Power
    123
    kinda sounds like you would like to swap (if you have the 4.0L) to an AW4 with the AWshifter that can give the feel of an auto but with the total control of a stick
    93' ZJ 4.7L STROKER, Clayton LONGARMS, 4wd conversion, 231 SYE, HPD30, 8.8, BFG 35's, 2000 manifold & injectors, Hesco fpr, Port & polish, LS1 valves, WJ Steering/brakes, KOR SliderZ & steering box brace, Clayton TB bracket and my custom trackbar, Crane ignition, B&M cooler, Tom Woods, etc....
    Quote Originally Posted by Krash80 View Post
    We're all insane here...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10 Re: Same crawl ratio...auto vs stick 
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Berkeley Springs, WV
    Posts
    56
    Rep Power
    0
    No dice I'm afraid on the swap, plus my 44re was rebuilt only 30k miles ago. Thanks for the answers guys.
    FOR SALE, red, lifted, 96 V8. Some armor, gears, and a trutrac.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •